If we look at our lives at the highest level, what is our purpose?
I know its difficult, but if for a second I seperate myself from work, family, friends and all the little things that surround me, what am I left with.
Never crossed my mind before, but now it has.. so why are we really here, sure as hell its not to have the best house/car/partner or to gain self-satisfaction, be it out of love, money or whatever drives us to do what we do everyday.
As a Muslim, I know that this life is temporary and we are all being 'tested' to submit to the will of God and to fullfill the rights of our fellow beings.
That makes sense, however it often gets lost in the scramble of our lives. Therefore most of what we do on a daily basis has little or nothing to do with our 'Purpose in life'.
Maybe I'm going off on a totally new tangent, but at first it doesnt really make sense to me, you have a purpose, yet you dont really do much about it...hmmm
----------------------------------------------------------------
Side note, sometimes things like what I mentioned above is used to manipulate the minds of the illiterate to incite violence and promote 'extremism', that is just wrong. The whole 'extremist philosophy' is more political than anything else in my opinion. God never wants you to go out and hurt someone else, regardless of what they may do to you.
Sunday, February 19, 2006
Karachi Beach!!!
In a recent article entitled "The battering of our beaches", Cowasjee documented the sad state of our beaches. Without hard and fast intervention, seems like the situation is going from bad to worse!
Here are some points from his article, I had no idea about:
"The city’s population is increasing by 500,000 a year. We need all our beaches to cater for increased recreational needs...Public access to the beach is integral to democracy and equality. Karachi is almost destitute of parks and playgrounds and open spaces. It has fewer acres of such spaces per 1,000 residents as compared to any major city in the developed world.
The city government has built two parallel parapets which hide the sea from public view. Parapets are normally hip-high as were the parapets built by Sir Jehangir Kothari in 1912, still standing for all to emulate. What our city government, obsessed with size, has built is head-high. Why? Could it be to enrich the brick makers and layers?
... And further folly from our MQM Minister for Ports & Shipping, Babar Ghauri. Whilst once in Jeddah on one of the many ‘official’ visits our ministers indulge in, he spotted a water jet spouting high into the air in front of the royal palaces. In search of glory, he ordered the Karachi Port Trust to have it replicated in Karachi’s sea, without bothering about how much it would cost to purchase, instal and operate.
Now to the real danger..."
I didn't want to post another HUGE article so I'm ending the cutting and pasting here. Expectedly, there is much more in his article that is worth reading. He touches on the bigger problems of the issue further on in his article, so if anyone is interested, here is where the article is!!!
Here are some points from his article, I had no idea about:
"The city’s population is increasing by 500,000 a year. We need all our beaches to cater for increased recreational needs...Public access to the beach is integral to democracy and equality. Karachi is almost destitute of parks and playgrounds and open spaces. It has fewer acres of such spaces per 1,000 residents as compared to any major city in the developed world.
The city government has built two parallel parapets which hide the sea from public view. Parapets are normally hip-high as were the parapets built by Sir Jehangir Kothari in 1912, still standing for all to emulate. What our city government, obsessed with size, has built is head-high. Why? Could it be to enrich the brick makers and layers?
... And further folly from our MQM Minister for Ports & Shipping, Babar Ghauri. Whilst once in Jeddah on one of the many ‘official’ visits our ministers indulge in, he spotted a water jet spouting high into the air in front of the royal palaces. In search of glory, he ordered the Karachi Port Trust to have it replicated in Karachi’s sea, without bothering about how much it would cost to purchase, instal and operate.
Now to the real danger..."
I didn't want to post another HUGE article so I'm ending the cutting and pasting here. Expectedly, there is much more in his article that is worth reading. He touches on the bigger problems of the issue further on in his article, so if anyone is interested, here is where the article is!!!
Friday, February 10, 2006
FYI...
ISRAEL PLANS TO BUILD 'MUSEUM OF TOLERANCE' ON MUSLIM GRAVES
By Donald Macintyre in Jerusalem
09 February 2006
Skeletons are being removed from the site of an ancient Muslim cemetery in Jerusalem to make way for a $150m (£86m) "museum of tolerance" being built for the Los Angeles-based Simon Wiesenthal Centre.
Palestinians have launched a legal battle to stop the work at what was the city's main Muslim cemetery. The work is to prepare for the construction of a museum which seeks the promotion of "unity and respect among Jews and between people of all faiths".
Israeli archaeologists and developers have continued excavating the remains of people buried at the site - which was a cemetery for at least 1,000 years - despite a temporary ban on work granted by the Islamic Court, a division of Israel's justice system. Police have been taking legal advice on whether the order is legally binding. The Israeli High Court is to hear a separate case brought by the Al Aqsa Association of the Islamic Movement in Israel next week.
[This is from The Independent. The rest of the article can be found here]
By Donald Macintyre in Jerusalem
09 February 2006
Skeletons are being removed from the site of an ancient Muslim cemetery in Jerusalem to make way for a $150m (£86m) "museum of tolerance" being built for the Los Angeles-based Simon Wiesenthal Centre.
Palestinians have launched a legal battle to stop the work at what was the city's main Muslim cemetery. The work is to prepare for the construction of a museum which seeks the promotion of "unity and respect among Jews and between people of all faiths".
Israeli archaeologists and developers have continued excavating the remains of people buried at the site - which was a cemetery for at least 1,000 years - despite a temporary ban on work granted by the Islamic Court, a division of Israel's justice system. Police have been taking legal advice on whether the order is legally binding. The Israeli High Court is to hear a separate case brought by the Al Aqsa Association of the Islamic Movement in Israel next week.
[This is from The Independent. The rest of the article can be found here]
Wednesday, February 08, 2006
FINALLY, some sense...
The following is an article about the DANISH CARTOONS. It's by Robert Fisk (a very intelligent and well-informed person). More of his writings on the Middle East can be found here.
(I know the article might be a bit 'long' for some but I totally thinks it's worth a read!)
---------------------------------------
Danish cartoons: provocative and perverse
By Robert Fisk
This is not an issue of secularism versus Islam. For Muslims, the Prophet is the man who received divine words directly from God. We see our saints and prophets as faintly historical figures, at odds with our high-tech human rights and freedoms, almost caricatures of themselves. The fact is that Muslims live their religion. We do not. They have kept their faith through innumerable historical vicissitudes. We have lost our faith.
SO now it’s cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed (PBUH). Ambassadors are withdrawn from Denmark, the Saudis and the Syrians complain, Gulf nations clear their shelves of Danish produce, Gaza gunmen threaten the European Union and foreign journalists.
In Denmark, Fleming Rose, the ‘culture’ editor of the pip-squeak newspaper which published these silly cartoons — last September, for heaven’s sake — announces that we are witnessing a “clash of civilizations” between secular western democracies and Islamic societies. This does prove, I suppose, that Danish journalists follow in the true tradition of Hans Christian Anderson. Oh lordy, lordy. What we’re witnessing is the childishness of civilizations.
So let’s start off with the Department of Home Truths. This is not an issue of secularism versus Islam. For Muslims, the Prophet is the man who received divine words directly from God. We see our saints and prophets as faintly historical figures, at odds with our high-tech human rights and freedoms, almost caricatures of themselves. The fact is that Muslims live their religion. We do not. They have kept their faith through innumerable historical vicissitudes. We have lost our faith ever since Matthew Arnold wrote about the sea’s “long withdrawing roar.” That’s why we talk about ‘the West versus Islam’ rather than ‘Christians versus Islam’ — because there aren’t an awful lot of Christians left in Europe. There is no way we can get round this by setting up all the other world religions and asking why we are not allowed to make fun of the Prophet.
Besides, we can exercise our own hypocrisy over religious feelings. I happen to remember how more than a decade ago, a film called the Last Temptation of Christ showed Jesus making love to a woman. In Paris, someone set fire to the cinema showing the movie, killing a young Frenchman. I also happen to remember a major US university which invited me to give a lecture three years ago. I did. It was entitled. “September 11, 2001: ask who did it but, for God’s sake, don’t ask why.” When I arrived, I found that the university authorities had deleted the phrase “for God’s sake” because “we didn’t want to offend certain sensibilities. Ah-ha, so we have ‘sensibilities’ too.
In other words, while we claim that Muslims must be good secularists when it comes to free speech — or cheap cartoons — we can worry about adherents to our own precious religion just as much. I also enjoyed the pompous claims of European statesmen that they cannot control free speech or newspapers. This is also nonsense. Had that cartoon of the Prophet shown instead a chief rabbi with a bomb-shaped hat, we would have had “anti-semitism” screamed into our ears — and rightly so — just as we often hear the Israelis complain about anti-semitic cartoons in Egyptian newspapers.
Furthermore, in some European nations — France is one, Germany and Austria are among the others — it is forbidden by law to deny acts of genocide. In France, for example, it is illegal to say that the Jewish Holocaust or the Armenian Holocaust did not happen (wait for Turkey’s problems over the latter if it ever gets into the EU). So it is in fact impermissible to make certain statements in European nations. I’m still uncertain whether these laws attain their objectives: however much you may prescribe Holocaust denial, anti-semites will always try to find a way round.
The point, however, is that we can hardly exercise our political restraints or laws to prevent anti-semitic cartoons or Holocaust deniers and then start screaming about secularism when we find that Muslims object to our provocative and insulting image of the Prophet.
For many Muslims, the ‘Islamic’ reaction to this whole squalid affair is an embarrassment. There is perfectly good reason to believe that Muslims would like to see some element of reform introduced to their religion. If this cartoon had advanced the cause of those who want to debate this issue — if it allowed for a serious dialogue and no one would have minded. But it was clearly intended to be provocative. It was so outrageous that it only caused reaction. And this is not a great time to heat up the old Samuel Huntington garbage about a ‘clash of civilizations’. Iran now has a clerical government again. So, to all intents and purposes, does Iraq (which was not supposed to end up with a democratically elected clerical administration, but that’s what happens when you topple dictators).
In Egypt, the Muslim Brotherhood won 20 per cent of the seats in the recent parliamentary elections. Now we have Hamas in charge of ‘Palestine’. There’s a message here, isn’t there? That America’s policies and ‘regime change’ and ‘democracy’ in the Middle East — are not achieving their ends. These millions of voters were preferring Islam to the corrupt regimes which we imposed on them. For the Danish cartoon to be dumped on top of this fire is dangerous indeed.
In any event, it’s not about whether the Prophet should be pictured. The Quran does not forbid images of the Prophet even though millions of Muslims do. The problem is that these cartoons portrayed Islam as a violent religion. It is not. Or do we want to make it so? —(c) The Independent
(I know the article might be a bit 'long' for some but I totally thinks it's worth a read!)
---------------------------------------
Danish cartoons: provocative and perverse
By Robert Fisk
This is not an issue of secularism versus Islam. For Muslims, the Prophet is the man who received divine words directly from God. We see our saints and prophets as faintly historical figures, at odds with our high-tech human rights and freedoms, almost caricatures of themselves. The fact is that Muslims live their religion. We do not. They have kept their faith through innumerable historical vicissitudes. We have lost our faith.
SO now it’s cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed (PBUH). Ambassadors are withdrawn from Denmark, the Saudis and the Syrians complain, Gulf nations clear their shelves of Danish produce, Gaza gunmen threaten the European Union and foreign journalists.
In Denmark, Fleming Rose, the ‘culture’ editor of the pip-squeak newspaper which published these silly cartoons — last September, for heaven’s sake — announces that we are witnessing a “clash of civilizations” between secular western democracies and Islamic societies. This does prove, I suppose, that Danish journalists follow in the true tradition of Hans Christian Anderson. Oh lordy, lordy. What we’re witnessing is the childishness of civilizations.
So let’s start off with the Department of Home Truths. This is not an issue of secularism versus Islam. For Muslims, the Prophet is the man who received divine words directly from God. We see our saints and prophets as faintly historical figures, at odds with our high-tech human rights and freedoms, almost caricatures of themselves. The fact is that Muslims live their religion. We do not. They have kept their faith through innumerable historical vicissitudes. We have lost our faith ever since Matthew Arnold wrote about the sea’s “long withdrawing roar.” That’s why we talk about ‘the West versus Islam’ rather than ‘Christians versus Islam’ — because there aren’t an awful lot of Christians left in Europe. There is no way we can get round this by setting up all the other world religions and asking why we are not allowed to make fun of the Prophet.
Besides, we can exercise our own hypocrisy over religious feelings. I happen to remember how more than a decade ago, a film called the Last Temptation of Christ showed Jesus making love to a woman. In Paris, someone set fire to the cinema showing the movie, killing a young Frenchman. I also happen to remember a major US university which invited me to give a lecture three years ago. I did. It was entitled. “September 11, 2001: ask who did it but, for God’s sake, don’t ask why.” When I arrived, I found that the university authorities had deleted the phrase “for God’s sake” because “we didn’t want to offend certain sensibilities. Ah-ha, so we have ‘sensibilities’ too.
In other words, while we claim that Muslims must be good secularists when it comes to free speech — or cheap cartoons — we can worry about adherents to our own precious religion just as much. I also enjoyed the pompous claims of European statesmen that they cannot control free speech or newspapers. This is also nonsense. Had that cartoon of the Prophet shown instead a chief rabbi with a bomb-shaped hat, we would have had “anti-semitism” screamed into our ears — and rightly so — just as we often hear the Israelis complain about anti-semitic cartoons in Egyptian newspapers.
Furthermore, in some European nations — France is one, Germany and Austria are among the others — it is forbidden by law to deny acts of genocide. In France, for example, it is illegal to say that the Jewish Holocaust or the Armenian Holocaust did not happen (wait for Turkey’s problems over the latter if it ever gets into the EU). So it is in fact impermissible to make certain statements in European nations. I’m still uncertain whether these laws attain their objectives: however much you may prescribe Holocaust denial, anti-semites will always try to find a way round.
The point, however, is that we can hardly exercise our political restraints or laws to prevent anti-semitic cartoons or Holocaust deniers and then start screaming about secularism when we find that Muslims object to our provocative and insulting image of the Prophet.
For many Muslims, the ‘Islamic’ reaction to this whole squalid affair is an embarrassment. There is perfectly good reason to believe that Muslims would like to see some element of reform introduced to their religion. If this cartoon had advanced the cause of those who want to debate this issue — if it allowed for a serious dialogue and no one would have minded. But it was clearly intended to be provocative. It was so outrageous that it only caused reaction. And this is not a great time to heat up the old Samuel Huntington garbage about a ‘clash of civilizations’. Iran now has a clerical government again. So, to all intents and purposes, does Iraq (which was not supposed to end up with a democratically elected clerical administration, but that’s what happens when you topple dictators).
In Egypt, the Muslim Brotherhood won 20 per cent of the seats in the recent parliamentary elections. Now we have Hamas in charge of ‘Palestine’. There’s a message here, isn’t there? That America’s policies and ‘regime change’ and ‘democracy’ in the Middle East — are not achieving their ends. These millions of voters were preferring Islam to the corrupt regimes which we imposed on them. For the Danish cartoon to be dumped on top of this fire is dangerous indeed.
In any event, it’s not about whether the Prophet should be pictured. The Quran does not forbid images of the Prophet even though millions of Muslims do. The problem is that these cartoons portrayed Islam as a violent religion. It is not. Or do we want to make it so? —(c) The Independent
Tuesday, February 07, 2006
Dimaagh Kharab
Our society is full of double standards, whereby everyone has a set of rules for themselves and another one to judge everyone else with. If you think about it, its a norm, and you generally just tend to accept it with time.
Why it is so...well here's AP's response ( please remember that i'm not the smarter one in this duo)
ALi says:
not really...the question is..why do we have them, and why are they socially accepted without question
AP says:
why we have them, i think, is a psycho-social question
AP says:
why they're socially accepted without question is simply b/c thats how everyone is..its the norm; it perpetuates itself.....u pass on the standard to ure kids and they pass it on and so on....
btw, if youre now thinking where this post is supposed to make sense, it really isnt..its just random rambling..
I need to get back to blogging, because i've put it off so much that its become a challenging task for me, procrastination always gets the better of me.
tomorrow,
[an]
Why it is so...well here's AP's response ( please remember that i'm not the smarter one in this duo)
ALi says:
not really...the question is..why do we have them, and why are they socially accepted without question
AP says:
why we have them, i think, is a psycho-social question
AP says:
why they're socially accepted without question is simply b/c thats how everyone is..its the norm; it perpetuates itself.....u pass on the standard to ure kids and they pass it on and so on....
btw, if youre now thinking where this post is supposed to make sense, it really isnt..its just random rambling..
I need to get back to blogging, because i've put it off so much that its become a challenging task for me, procrastination always gets the better of me.
tomorrow,
[an]
Thursday, February 02, 2006
Dog Food for Famine Victims!
Below are excerpts from the an article entitled "New Zealand Food Help for Kenyans is for the Dogs" By Alexander Schwabe. The rest of the article can be found here.
-------------
"Kenya is suffering from an ongoing drought. What the young woman saw in Kenya disturbed her deeply. Upon her return to her hometown of North Canterbury in New Zealand, she told friends and family about the hunger in the eastern African country. Her stories were so heart-wrenching that a friend of her mother's, the dog-food manufacturer Christine Drummond, came up with the idea of sending 42 tons of powdered dog food to Kenya's famine victims.
Not surprisingly, the Kenyan government refused this offer. John Munyes, the Kenyan minister responsible for aid programs, said it was an insult to think his nation would accept animal food. Drummond had sought to avoid exactly this response. In order to demonstrate the sincerity of her offer, she promised that the dog food was very nutritious and actually quite tasty. She and her children, she said, mix it in with their breakfast cereal every morning.
In preparing to deliver the dog food, Drummond even developed a recipe that was tailored to the conditions in Kenya. "The first plan was to send dog biscuits, and change the vitamins," she told a Christchurch paper called The Press. "Then, when I heard there were so many little children, I couldn't send them a bicky."Instead, she developed a powder that could be mixed with water and turned into a meal. It was based primarily on corn, which is a major staple of the Kenyan diet, but also contained freeze-dried meat: beef, sheep, pork, chicken and venison. Also involved were clams, seaweed, garlic, eggs, cereals and flax.
The Kenyans were far from impressed. "The offer was very naïve and culturally insulting, given the meaning of dogs in our culture," said Kenyan government spokesman Alfred Mutua. Drummond, he admitted, may have been trying to help, but her offer was "unacceptable."No one denies that Kenya's situation is desperate. An ongoing drought and failed harvests have led to 3.5 million people suffering from hunger. President Mwai Kibaki has announced a state of emergency. But the dog-food offer has generated shock and outrage. Zipporah Kittony, head of the Kenyan women's group Maendeleo ya Wanawake, called the offer the highest form of abuse which Kenyan women and children could be subjected to. Especially in times of drought, she said, children must be handled with dignity."
-------------
"Kenya is suffering from an ongoing drought. What the young woman saw in Kenya disturbed her deeply. Upon her return to her hometown of North Canterbury in New Zealand, she told friends and family about the hunger in the eastern African country. Her stories were so heart-wrenching that a friend of her mother's, the dog-food manufacturer Christine Drummond, came up with the idea of sending 42 tons of powdered dog food to Kenya's famine victims.
Not surprisingly, the Kenyan government refused this offer. John Munyes, the Kenyan minister responsible for aid programs, said it was an insult to think his nation would accept animal food. Drummond had sought to avoid exactly this response. In order to demonstrate the sincerity of her offer, she promised that the dog food was very nutritious and actually quite tasty. She and her children, she said, mix it in with their breakfast cereal every morning.
In preparing to deliver the dog food, Drummond even developed a recipe that was tailored to the conditions in Kenya. "The first plan was to send dog biscuits, and change the vitamins," she told a Christchurch paper called The Press. "Then, when I heard there were so many little children, I couldn't send them a bicky."Instead, she developed a powder that could be mixed with water and turned into a meal. It was based primarily on corn, which is a major staple of the Kenyan diet, but also contained freeze-dried meat: beef, sheep, pork, chicken and venison. Also involved were clams, seaweed, garlic, eggs, cereals and flax.
The Kenyans were far from impressed. "The offer was very naïve and culturally insulting, given the meaning of dogs in our culture," said Kenyan government spokesman Alfred Mutua. Drummond, he admitted, may have been trying to help, but her offer was "unacceptable."No one denies that Kenya's situation is desperate. An ongoing drought and failed harvests have led to 3.5 million people suffering from hunger. President Mwai Kibaki has announced a state of emergency. But the dog-food offer has generated shock and outrage. Zipporah Kittony, head of the Kenyan women's group Maendeleo ya Wanawake, called the offer the highest form of abuse which Kenyan women and children could be subjected to. Especially in times of drought, she said, children must be handled with dignity."
Monday, January 30, 2006
crazy? smart? smart? crazy? - what's going on?
Ok, really - so is he the crazy one with a death wish or can he really emerge as the visionary leader of the muslim world?I place my bet on the former! The picture is from "The World Without Zionism" Conference held in October 2005, where he said that Israel should be "wiped off the map" and that it should be moved to Europe or Alaska!!!!
Yeah, right!!!
BUT - onto the NUCLEAR issue....
Side A: Fair enough - after all, Iran has signed the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, which gives countries the right to pursue nuclear technology for peaceful use.
Side B: Also, a valid point - after all, the 'mullahs' dont have a very good track record!!
So who's right?
Sunday, January 08, 2006
Social Sin???
This one is for all those who have sold their 'souls to a corporation'...(you know who you are, right, AN????)
Allow me to share a simple paragraph from a letter on world hunger called 'Sharing Daily Bread' written by some canadian bishops back in the 70's.
"No amount of generosity extended to the underdeveloped nations will significantly alleviate world hunger until the market system itself is changed. The present market is designed primarily to make profits, not to feed people. The supply & distribution of food is determined mainly by effective demand, not by human need. Effective demand is usually defined in terms of abilty to pay. Food supplies are often controlled in such a way as to drive up prices in the market. A contradictiin is built into the system producing and distributing food. Human society does not plan to grow adequate food supplies for its population and then distriubte them to people according to their objective requirements. Instead, the institution which regulates the production and delivery of food is defined by a principle, the profit priniciple, which has no direct relation to peole's needs".
The fact that this is the way the system works today illustrates collective/social sin. The 'sin' part i might delve into another time. Suffice is to say that we need a lot more than food aid to help the world - we need to buy back some of those 'sold souls'!!!!!
Allow me to share a simple paragraph from a letter on world hunger called 'Sharing Daily Bread' written by some canadian bishops back in the 70's.
"No amount of generosity extended to the underdeveloped nations will significantly alleviate world hunger until the market system itself is changed. The present market is designed primarily to make profits, not to feed people. The supply & distribution of food is determined mainly by effective demand, not by human need. Effective demand is usually defined in terms of abilty to pay. Food supplies are often controlled in such a way as to drive up prices in the market. A contradictiin is built into the system producing and distributing food. Human society does not plan to grow adequate food supplies for its population and then distriubte them to people according to their objective requirements. Instead, the institution which regulates the production and delivery of food is defined by a principle, the profit priniciple, which has no direct relation to peole's needs".
The fact that this is the way the system works today illustrates collective/social sin. The 'sin' part i might delve into another time. Suffice is to say that we need a lot more than food aid to help the world - we need to buy back some of those 'sold souls'!!!!!
Monday, January 02, 2006
41 years later...
I found this here:
Science died in 1965: The article “Death of Science” by Ms Zubeida Mustafa needs elaboration. Actually science died in Pakistan on September 5, 1965. It so happened that the government of Ayub Khan set up various commissions on education, science etc.
The science commision consisted of eminent scientists Professor Abdus Salam, Dr Salimuzzaman Siddiqui and Dr I.H. Usmani.It submitted its report to President Ayub on Sept. 5, 1965 at a meeting held in Swat. It recommended setting up of laboratories and training of science teachers from the primary to university level and recommended increased funding.
The next day, war broke out between India and Pakistan and all the funding recommended was diverted to the war effort. The biggest victim of the 1965 war was science in Pakistan.
By DR S.M. ISMAIL, Karachi
=> What a cool opinion!!!
Science died in 1965: The article “Death of Science” by Ms Zubeida Mustafa needs elaboration. Actually science died in Pakistan on September 5, 1965. It so happened that the government of Ayub Khan set up various commissions on education, science etc.
The science commision consisted of eminent scientists Professor Abdus Salam, Dr Salimuzzaman Siddiqui and Dr I.H. Usmani.It submitted its report to President Ayub on Sept. 5, 1965 at a meeting held in Swat. It recommended setting up of laboratories and training of science teachers from the primary to university level and recommended increased funding.
The next day, war broke out between India and Pakistan and all the funding recommended was diverted to the war effort. The biggest victim of the 1965 war was science in Pakistan.
By DR S.M. ISMAIL, Karachi
=> What a cool opinion!!!
Friday, December 23, 2005
Location::Karachi
I'm in Karachi now, and it took us 38 hours to get here. Here are details on the delays
Toronto - 3 hrs ( Plane wouldnt start)
Manchester - 3 hrs (Re-fueling took forever)
Lahore - 12 hrs (The pilot landed the plane in intense fog, but all flights were grounded as soon as we landed( I think he was from Lahore). So we spent most of the night playing 'dumb charades' and discussing random things with fellow strandees. Definitely a night to remember.
Anyway, all of yesterday was spent on un-jetlagging, wedding(s) and some chilling with the homies. It's quite disappointing to see that red apple( the chicken roll place in khadda market) is still on its way down.
more later,
[an]
Toronto - 3 hrs ( Plane wouldnt start)
Manchester - 3 hrs (Re-fueling took forever)
Lahore - 12 hrs (The pilot landed the plane in intense fog, but all flights were grounded as soon as we landed( I think he was from Lahore). So we spent most of the night playing 'dumb charades' and discussing random things with fellow strandees. Definitely a night to remember.
Anyway, all of yesterday was spent on un-jetlagging, wedding(s) and some chilling with the homies. It's quite disappointing to see that red apple( the chicken roll place in khadda market) is still on its way down.
more later,
[an]
Thursday, December 22, 2005
While we're on poetry...
One of my ultimate favs...
Are you looking for me?
I am in the next seat.
My shoulder is against yours.
You will not find me in the stupas,
not in Indian shrine rooms, nor synagogues,
nor in cathedrals; not in masses, nor kirtans,
not in legs winding around your own neck,
nor in eating nothing but vegetables,
When you really look for me, you will see me instantly
— you will find me in the tiniest house of time.
Kabir says: Student, tell me, what is God?
He is the breath inside the breath.
- Kabir
Are you looking for me?
I am in the next seat.
My shoulder is against yours.
You will not find me in the stupas,
not in Indian shrine rooms, nor synagogues,
nor in cathedrals; not in masses, nor kirtans,
not in legs winding around your own neck,
nor in eating nothing but vegetables,
When you really look for me, you will see me instantly
— you will find me in the tiniest house of time.
Kabir says: Student, tell me, what is God?
He is the breath inside the breath.
- Kabir
Tuesday, December 20, 2005
Mehdi Hasan
sung by Mehdi Hasan, poetry by Bahadur Shah Zafar(the last of the Mughals)
1. baat karni mujhe mushkil kabhi aisi to na thi
jaisi ab hai, teri mehfil, kabhi aisi to na thi
[It was never as difficult for me to talk, as it is now
Your gathering has never before been, like it is now]
2. le gayaa cheen ke kaun aaj teraa sabr-o-qaraar?
beqaraari tujhe, ae dil! kabhi aisi to na thi
[Who has taken away your peace of mind and patience
My heart, you were never as uneasy like you are now]
3. un ki aaNkhoN ne, KHudaa jaane, kiyaa kyaa jaadoo
yeh tabeeyat meri maa'il(attracted) kabhi aisi to na thi
[God only knows, what magic her eyes have weaved
My feelings for her was never as attractive as it is now]
4. kyaa sabab tu jo bigaD.taa hai 'zafar' se har baar?
KHoo teri hoor-e-shimaa'il kabhi aisi to na thi
[What is the reason, you get offended at 'zafar' all the time
You, the best angel, never had a habit, like you have now]
Dictionary : sabr - patience; qaraar - peace; maa'il - attracted;
KHoo - habit; hoor - angel; shimaa'il - the very best amongst the lot
p.s i got it off here
1. baat karni mujhe mushkil kabhi aisi to na thi
jaisi ab hai, teri mehfil, kabhi aisi to na thi
[It was never as difficult for me to talk, as it is now
Your gathering has never before been, like it is now]
2. le gayaa cheen ke kaun aaj teraa sabr-o-qaraar?
beqaraari tujhe, ae dil! kabhi aisi to na thi
[Who has taken away your peace of mind and patience
My heart, you were never as uneasy like you are now]
3. un ki aaNkhoN ne, KHudaa jaane, kiyaa kyaa jaadoo
yeh tabeeyat meri maa'il(attracted) kabhi aisi to na thi
[God only knows, what magic her eyes have weaved
My feelings for her was never as attractive as it is now]
4. kyaa sabab tu jo bigaD.taa hai 'zafar' se har baar?
KHoo teri hoor-e-shimaa'il kabhi aisi to na thi
[What is the reason, you get offended at 'zafar' all the time
You, the best angel, never had a habit, like you have now]
Dictionary : sabr - patience; qaraar - peace; maa'il - attracted;
KHoo - habit; hoor - angel; shimaa'il - the very best amongst the lot
p.s i got it off here
Wednesday, December 07, 2005
yawn * is it time to get up?
Firstly, why i've been MIA for more than a week.
1.Week before montreal
2.Montreal
3.Recovering from montreal
4.Work Work
5.Crazy weekend ( raptors - 9th row, salsa, v3 with the browntown crew)
6.Flu
7.Recovering from the Flu
As for all the requests about details on my trip to montreal, i've decided not to talk about it, cuz some day my kids might read this blog...lol
Random things that happened recently
1. Dad called and asked if he should swap his p900(cell phone) for a "blueberry", and if my "blueberry" was a good phone.
2. Zaed( of falak fame)sent their new recording of "Yaadein" to me....one word...amazing..pata nahi baychaaray canada mein kiyoun phans gayay hain..you must go check out one of their shows if youre ever in T.O
3. AP sent the "crush calculator to me, and being the smartA$$ that i am, i put in silly answers that went to someone else.
4. The raptors won!!! NO they did not...
5. I realized that I need a date for the office christmas party, which is in a week...
6. I started reading "Maps for Lost Lovers" by Nadeem Aslam, and all I can say after a hundred pages is "CRAZY SHIZZEL". This is "EAST is EAST" on steroids!! review to come soon.
Gotta run,
1.Week before montreal
2.Montreal
3.Recovering from montreal
4.Work Work
5.Crazy weekend ( raptors - 9th row, salsa, v3 with the browntown crew)
6.Flu
7.Recovering from the Flu
As for all the requests about details on my trip to montreal, i've decided not to talk about it, cuz some day my kids might read this blog...lol
Random things that happened recently
1. Dad called and asked if he should swap his p900(cell phone) for a "blueberry", and if my "blueberry" was a good phone.
2. Zaed( of falak fame)sent their new recording of "Yaadein" to me....one word...amazing..pata nahi baychaaray canada mein kiyoun phans gayay hain..you must go check out one of their shows if youre ever in T.O
3. AP sent the "crush calculator to me, and being the smartA$$ that i am, i put in silly answers that went to someone else.
4. The raptors won!!! NO they did not...
5. I realized that I need a date for the office christmas party, which is in a week...
6. I started reading "Maps for Lost Lovers" by Nadeem Aslam, and all I can say after a hundred pages is "CRAZY SHIZZEL". This is "EAST is EAST" on steroids!! review to come soon.
Gotta run,
Wednesday, November 30, 2005
Darfur, anybody?
So while we wait for Ali to share his Montreal experiences with us (along with other cool thoughts) , I thought I would share my thoughts-of-the-day...
I heard yesterday that:
- The UN called the Genocide in Darfur the 'worst humanitarian crisis' ever (this was before the Tsunami hit)
- 400,000 people have been killed
- 2.5 millions have been displaced due to violence
- 3.5 million are starving
- Countless others have & still are being brutally raped
(The facts are according to recent reports by the World Food Program, the United Nations and the Coalition for International Justice).
One day though, we will be able to sit around and figure out exactly what happened when they make a movie about it. Wasn't it the same with The Killing Fields, Hotel Rwanda, etc....?
I'm thinking that perhaps God should send them an earthquake.... what else would kick us into action?
I heard yesterday that:
- The UN called the Genocide in Darfur the 'worst humanitarian crisis' ever (this was before the Tsunami hit)
- 400,000 people have been killed
- 2.5 millions have been displaced due to violence
- 3.5 million are starving
- Countless others have & still are being brutally raped
(The facts are according to recent reports by the World Food Program, the United Nations and the Coalition for International Justice).
One day though, we will be able to sit around and figure out exactly what happened when they make a movie about it. Wasn't it the same with The Killing Fields, Hotel Rwanda, etc....?
I'm thinking that perhaps God should send them an earthquake.... what else would kick us into action?
Sunday, November 27, 2005
What It Is (Part II)
So by default, it seems that I have been assigned the role of bringing to light the 'realistic' aspect of Random-Realism. The aim now is to be more realistic than Ali is random :P
I would like to see this blog consist of some intellectual discussion on real (& sometimes unpleasant) issues that people face on a daily basis. Sometimes its too easy to get caught up in our lives which makes it that much easier to not think about or talk about what's happening out there! Breaking through some of the daily superficiality is, in my opinion, an important and much-needed task which I hope, this blog can contribute to.
So, I too, hope that people contribute and share ideas, feelings & attitudes along with some good 'ol fun!!!
I would like to see this blog consist of some intellectual discussion on real (& sometimes unpleasant) issues that people face on a daily basis. Sometimes its too easy to get caught up in our lives which makes it that much easier to not think about or talk about what's happening out there! Breaking through some of the daily superficiality is, in my opinion, an important and much-needed task which I hope, this blog can contribute to.
So, I too, hope that people contribute and share ideas, feelings & attitudes along with some good 'ol fun!!!
Friday, November 25, 2005
Montréal
Off today to montreal with the homies. This is part of our bi-annual pilgrimage, and despite all the conversations, its always montreal. I dont want to talk much about it right now, except montreal is probably the best city in the world for a good weekend. It helps to have good friends (read bachpan ke dost) there too, but nevertheless its amazing.
might even take some pictures this time.
On a side note, since i havent blogged in a while, it feels like i'm writing emails at work. If you look at the post below, its got a very "office email" look to it. Be patient, i'll lose it soon. I'm consciously writing unstructured sentences.
another side note, I need to get a sense of the audience (if there is any), but it would be interesting to get a word or two on people or their inclinations.
So if you leave a comment, please use one word (this is completely voluntary, and you can post comments anonymously) to identify yourself e.g techie, eeyanh (this is a word that i invented/discovered, in a random conversation- fikar not, post about eeyanh people sometime this year), jihadi, pointless ,lost hehehe..and yes this is judging people by just one word they say(think of it more like a 'market survey')
Out,
might even take some pictures this time.
On a side note, since i havent blogged in a while, it feels like i'm writing emails at work. If you look at the post below, its got a very "office email" look to it. Be patient, i'll lose it soon. I'm consciously writing unstructured sentences.
another side note, I need to get a sense of the audience (if there is any), but it would be interesting to get a word or two on people or their inclinations.
So if you leave a comment, please use one word (this is completely voluntary, and you can post comments anonymously) to identify yourself e.g techie, eeyanh (this is a word that i invented/discovered, in a random conversation- fikar not, post about eeyanh people sometime this year), jihadi, pointless ,lost hehehe..and yes this is judging people by just one word they say(think of it more like a 'market survey')
Out,
what it is?
Ok, so i ask myself the question, what is this blog about, any subject, theme, and the answer is 'absolute nothingness'
However, this is a team blog, with AP providing food for thought, read the post below, and i will quite happily provide the 'random mailee comedy'. For random-realism, i'm the random part.
i believe its going to be a fun ride, cuz its going to be contrast of not just ideas, but attitudes.
There will be a host of ppl posting their little blurbs from time to time, and almost everyone is welcome to send a note to us if they want to put something up.
Thanks for reading!
However, this is a team blog, with AP providing food for thought, read the post below, and i will quite happily provide the 'random mailee comedy'. For random-realism, i'm the random part.
i believe its going to be a fun ride, cuz its going to be contrast of not just ideas, but attitudes.
There will be a host of ppl posting their little blurbs from time to time, and almost everyone is welcome to send a note to us if they want to put something up.
Thanks for reading!
Wednesday, November 23, 2005
My Debut...
Ok AN,
I made it here finally!!!! Be proud, my friend...
Khair, so I had a plan and everything about what I was going to post but then I had a very interesting discussion with my supy yesterday and I was telling him this story from Bangladesh(which I forgot about earlier). So, this one time I was at my neighbours house (who couldnt speak much english) and we struggling to have a decent conversation. Basically she just wanted to know what I cooked and what i ate, etc. and then suddenly she said "Do you take 'free showers'??" and I was like, "huh?" and then she whispered it again. So after I asked her what in the world those were, she said "you know, when you take a shower without your clothes on?"!!!! In an attempt to be culturally senstive I tried not to laugh and continued to figure out what it was. Essentially, many people in the more rural areas thought that you shouldn't take a bath with your clothes off b/c the angels that sit on your shoulders will see you naked and that of course, is shameful!!!!! Khair, there were quite a number of folks I met who did not take these 'free showers' ...
The point of this is that it got me thinking even more about the fact that the problem with muslims today (actually ONE of the problems with them today b/c there are many) is this literalism, where people forget the point of the story. I think the deal with the angels is to always remember that God is watching you; I dont literally believe that angels are sitting there. I think people forget the forest and start concentrating on the trees. It's the same thing with praying or hijab or men wearing their shalwars above a certain length and all those other things that cause so much confusion...
Anyhow, so that's what I was thinking of today!!!
I made it here finally!!!! Be proud, my friend...
Khair, so I had a plan and everything about what I was going to post but then I had a very interesting discussion with my supy yesterday and I was telling him this story from Bangladesh(which I forgot about earlier). So, this one time I was at my neighbours house (who couldnt speak much english) and we struggling to have a decent conversation. Basically she just wanted to know what I cooked and what i ate, etc. and then suddenly she said "Do you take 'free showers'??" and I was like, "huh?" and then she whispered it again. So after I asked her what in the world those were, she said "you know, when you take a shower without your clothes on?"!!!! In an attempt to be culturally senstive I tried not to laugh and continued to figure out what it was. Essentially, many people in the more rural areas thought that you shouldn't take a bath with your clothes off b/c the angels that sit on your shoulders will see you naked and that of course, is shameful!!!!! Khair, there were quite a number of folks I met who did not take these 'free showers' ...
The point of this is that it got me thinking even more about the fact that the problem with muslims today (actually ONE of the problems with them today b/c there are many) is this literalism, where people forget the point of the story. I think the deal with the angels is to always remember that God is watching you; I dont literally believe that angels are sitting there. I think people forget the forest and start concentrating on the trees. It's the same thing with praying or hijab or men wearing their shalwars above a certain length and all those other things that cause so much confusion...
Anyhow, so that's what I was thinking of today!!!
Sunday, November 20, 2005
Shuruaat
Hi AP,
Yeh lo, hum ne blog shuroo kar diya, ab koshish yeh hai ke hamaray puranay afsanay bhi mil jaeein ta'ke un ko bhi hum yahan shaya kar dein.
Yeh lo, hum ne blog shuroo kar diya, ab koshish yeh hai ke hamaray puranay afsanay bhi mil jaeein ta'ke un ko bhi hum yahan shaya kar dein.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)